Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Networks walk a tightrope over crowded debates (AP)

NEW YORK ? Keeping the crowded Republican presidential debates fair, lively and topical at the same time can seem like the equivalent of juggling while walking a tightrope.

CNN's Wolf Blitzer is the next television personality on stage. He's moderating Tuesday's GOP forum in Washington, a little more than a week after a misplaced email from the CBS News political director raised questions about whether networks give short shrift to candidates they determine have little chance at reaching the White House.

The fluidity of the Republican nomination process and the increased importance of the debates make fairness an important issue. Viewership is up significantly compared with a similar point in the campaign four years ago, and political pros say the debate performances of Herman Cain, Michelle Bachmann and Rick Perry have had a big impact on their poll standings.

Tim Graham of the Media Research Center, a conservative press watchdog, said he thinks there is "a tilt" at the networks "toward front-runners."

"The only thing that makes it less unfair is that the front-runners keep changing," Graham said.

That nod to front-runners was made clear when CBS political director John Dickerson questioned, in an email sent to colleagues on Nov. 12, how much airtime Bachmann would be getting during and after the network's debate that night. "She's not going to get many questions," he wrote, in apparent reference to Bachmann's shrinking standing in opinion polls.

The email was mistakenly sent to Bachmann's campaign, which immediately seized upon it. Keith Nahigian, her campaign manager, said on Facebook that the email was "concrete evidence confirming what every conservative already knows ? the liberal mainstream media elites are manipulating the Republican debates by purposely suppressing our conservative message."

During that night's debate, there were seven questions addressed to Bachmann ? four of them during an online-only portion shown after the television network's coverage ended. Cain and Newt Gingrich were asked 11 questions each, and Mitt Romney had 10. Perry and Rick Santorum each had eight questions, while Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman each had five.

PBS' Jim Lehrer, who has moderated 11 general election presidential debates, said running these pre-primary debates is extremely difficult.

"You not only want to be fair, you have to be perceived as being fair," Lehrer said, "and it's really hard when you have eight or nine candidates."

Playing favorites in terms of questions asked is dangerous because, as borne out by this year's opinion polls, today's also-ran could be tomorrow's front-runner. A network that doesn't try to treat everyone onstage equally is "buying themselves a lot of trouble that they don't need," said Lehrer, author of a recent book on debates, "Tension City: My View From the Middle Seat."

A network might naturally want to spend more time with a front-runner, but in these situations has a civic role more than a journalistic one, Lehrer said. CBS News President David Rhodes argued that handling the debates as journalists serves a civic purpose.

"Part of why we're here is to serve an audience," Rhodes said. "The audience has a greater interest in people who are more likely to succeed in the process. You could argue that's unfair because some of the people who are not successful today could become successful tomorrow, and that's true. But that's a challenge for these people ? not for us."

Networks usually have people backstage keeping track of how many questions are asked, often with stopwatches to measure airtime, said David Bohrman, president of Current TV and former CNN Washington bureau chief. If there was too much of an imbalance, he would try to get word to the moderator.

"You have to treat all of the candidates the same," said Sam Feist, CNN's current Washington bureau chief. "If you're going to invite them, you have to treat them the same, particularly with the fluidity of this race."

Except for some quick follow-up questions, moderators at recent debates aired on CNBC and Fox News Channel made a conscious effort to ask each candidate onstage to address one issue at the start of their debates. Fox said it tries to treat each candidate equally; NBC News would not discuss its debate policies.

An examination of transcripts for four debates (one each by CNN, CBS, Fox and CNBC) revealed that Romney, generally perceived as the campaign's front-runner, had the most questions addressed to him. He had 45, with Cain next at 37, Perry at 36 and Gingrich at 35. Santorum and Bachmann had 29 and Paul had 27. Huntsman did not participate in all four debates.

Even the networks that strive for some equality in asking questions can't guarantee equal time on camera. If one candidate specifically criticizes another in an answer, the victimized candidate is generally given rebuttal time. Organizers seem to relish when a couple of candidates go after one another and often let those exchanges play out.

"It's a vicious cycle," Bohrman said. "People who are more in the news have more to say and are paid more attention to, and they have even more to say."

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/topstories/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111122/ap_on_en_tv/us_tv_fair_debates

matt moore matt moore national grid andrew luck andrew luck day light savings time 2011 hocus pocus

Apple iTunes 10.5.1


Apple has finally released the last piece of the iCloud puzzle?iTunes Match. For $25 annually, this new service will store any digital music you own on Apple's servers and make it available to any iTunes-capable device or computer. If Apple already has your music in its cloud, you don't even have to upload it, as you do with other services like Amazon's Cloud Player or Google Music (Free, 3.5 stars). This comes on the heels of another cloud feature?iTunes in the Cloud, which ironically, removes some of the need for iTunes itself. Users of iPads, iPhones, and iPod touches will no longer need to sync to a PC running iTunes in order to sync music, Apps, or e-books. And if iDevice users still do want to sync to a computer, iTunes finally lets them do so over Wi-Fi. Though you can play music and video in other apps, iTunes remains the media software to beat.

Part of the reason for this is that Apple just keeps improving on iTunes. Version 10 added Apple TV integration, TV show rentals, better app management and Ping, a Facebook-like music-oriented social network that lives inside the media player software. Version 10.2 added support for the iOS 4.3 operating system on iPod touch, iPhone, and iPad 2 ($499-$829, 4.5 stars), along with support for Home Sharing's streaming video to those devices. The wireless streaming feature, AirPlay lets you send music to compatible third-part audio devices?which are finally showing up. In version 10.3, Apple added the piece of iCloud called iTunes in the Cloud, which makes downloading music, apps, and books to multiple apps easier.

Other recent innovations still worthy of note include Genius playlists and Genius mixes. They automatically create playlists based on song styles and moods. iTunes LP is another, giving you liner notes, photos, and video to go along with an album. Its DJ feature lets you create a live mix in which friends can make requests and vote on songs. This is in addition to what other players give you?an equalizer, Internet radio, and podcast subscriptions.

Setup and First Impressions
iTunes is, of course, available for Mac OS X (version 10.5 or later), as well as Windows 7, Vista, and XP. If your PC is running a 64-bit version of Vista or Windows 7, you'll need to download the separate 64-bit installer. By default, the installer makes iTunes your default player for audio files, though you can uncheck this if you prefer Windows Media Player (Free, 4 stars), Winamp (Free, 4 stars), or another player.

After you install the software on a Mac, a setup assistant asks you questions that help it customize your installation. The Windows version asks you whether you want to add all songs, audio, and convert and add Windows Media Audio (WMA) files. You can also have iTunes organize your library by renaming files and moving them to the folders that match. A final privacy check asks if you want the app to download album art.

After you first launch iTunes, you're offered nine tutorials that cover topics ranging from the Ping service to iTunes U; these offer a good, simple way to get you started with unfamiliar features. One disappointment in starting up and signing into iTunes is that there's no easy way to switch among multiple accounts.

Apple doesn't add new file format support with this release, but I should note that the player software no longer requires a separate QuickTime installation to play media. You're still more likely to be able to play that difficult file in the excellent VLC media player (Free, 4 stars) media player, which supports over 20 video formats alone, compared with iTunes' seven.

iTunes in the Cloud
With its inclusion of iCloud, one of the most frustrating things about iTunes has been rectified. I can't tell you how many times I've tried getting some music from one iDevice to another, only to be thwarted by Apple's rules about what can be moved where. iTunes in the Cloud and iTunes Match put an end to much of this hassle, letting you download your music to up to ten other devices. But you'll have to pay $24.99 a year for iTunes Match if you want to include your non-iTunes-purchased songs in that capability. The service can also sync any new music you purchase to any device you're logged into with the same Apple ID.

With iTunes in the Cloud, this "download to any of your devices" goes for Apps and iBooks as well as music. On your iOS devices, you'll see a Purchased choice in the iTunes, iBooks, and App Store apps, from which you can download the content you've already bought on another member of your iTunes/iOS ecosystem. You can even have some of this content downloaded automatically to all devices or iTunes, regardless of on which device the content was purchased. Under Preferences/Store Preferences, you can choose automatic downloads for Music, Apps, and Books.

iTunes Match is a componenet of iTunes in the Cloud/iCloud that implements one of the cleverer cloud ideas around: If the company already has a song stored on its servers, you needn't upload it to get everywhere access. And if Apple's copy (always AAC 256Kbps iTunes Plus quality) is of better quality, you'll get that better version next time you download the song. This even applies to music acquired through other means than iTunes.

The $24.99-a-year fee allows a maximum of 25,000 songs. Setting up Match involves a three-step setup process: Gathering information about your iTunes Library, matching your music with songs in the iTunes Store, and uploading the remaining music and album art. In my testing, since I only had to upload music not in Apple's huge store, the cloud-ifying process was much quicker for iTunes than for Amazon Cloud Player and Google Music. On the downside, those competing services let you play the music from any web browser, while Apple's offering requires either iTunes installed or an iOS 5 device.

After this all music will appear on all iOS devices or computer's copies of iTunes that your account is logged in to?up to ten devices total. A cloud icon shows up next to songs that need to be downloaded. One issue with the process though, is that when you enable Match on an iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch, the device's music library will be completely replaced by the Matched library. But that's not an issue if you Match the iTunes library that you were already syncing the device to. On other computer logged into the same iTunes account, you can stream any Matched music without having to download it onto your hard drive.

Ping?The Walled Music Social Network
Ping is a music-oriented social network that lets you follow (in the Twitter sense) performers and other iTunes users, meaning you'll see which songs they "liked, purchased, or commented on." It also lets users indicate concerts they plan to attend, and offers to find you tickets, too. Really, it's just a direct link to TicketMaster's page for the event. The activity stream looks a lot like Facebook's, down to the blue theme.

You're very limited to what you can post to Ping, as compared with Facebook?no photos, links, or videos, and the lack of a Web version means that Ping lives strictly within iTunes' walled garden. Sure, Apple claims over 160 million iTunes users as potential Pingers, but do users want to open a particular app to take part in a vertical social network, when vertical social networks have pretty much fallen by the wayside anyway?

Privacy is well handled in Ping. You can choose to manually designate which actions to share with your followers, require your approval before anyone can follow you, or not allow others to follow you, if you just want to see what other musicians and fans are up to. If someone you want to follow has protected their posts, you'll get a request-to-follow message box. For more on Apple's social network, read my Apple iTunes Ping: Hands On.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ziffdavis/pcmag/~3/alYOvTILJxI/0,2817,2368917,00.asp

richard stallman williston north dakota williston north dakota kody brown transylvania terrell owens terrell owens

Monday, November 21, 2011

Obama to sign bipartisan bill to help jobless vets (AP)

WASHINGTON ? President Barack Obama will sign into law Monday legislation giving tax breaks to companies that hire unemployed veterans.

The bill passed Congress last week with rare bipartisan support. But the brief moment of unity is being overshadowed by the apparent failure of lawmakers from both parties to reach an agreement on $1.2 trillion in savings ahead of a Wednesday deadline for the special deficit-reduction supercommittee.

The legislation Obama is set to sign creates tax breaks for companies that hire jobless veterans and helps vets get job training and counseling. It also repeals a 2006 law that would require the federal, state and local governments to withhold 3 percent of their payments to contractors.

The veterans' legislation is the first proposal included in Obama's $447 billion bill to win congressional approval.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/economy/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111121/ap_on_re_us/us_obama

sand dollar just dance 3 just dance 3 cliff lee cliff lee the raven the raven

Romney scores a key endorsement in NH

Republican presidential candidate former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, right, looks on as Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., endorse him outside City Hall in Nashua, N.H., Sunday, Nov. 20, 2011. Watching at left is Ayotte's husband Joe. (AP Photo/Winslow Townson)

Republican presidential candidate former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, right, looks on as Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., endorse him outside City Hall in Nashua, N.H., Sunday, Nov. 20, 2011. Watching at left is Ayotte's husband Joe. (AP Photo/Winslow Townson)

Republican presidential hopeful, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, right, greets a young supporter during a town hall event in Peterborough, N.H., Saturday, Nov. 19, 2011. Romney is campaigning for the nation's earliest presidential primary, which is less than two months away. (AP Photo/Michael Dwyer)

Republican presidential hopeful, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney pauses while speaking during a town hall event in Peterborough, N.H., Saturday, Nov. 19, 2011. Romney is campaigning for the nation's earliest presidential primary, which is less than two months away. (AP Photo/Michael Dwyer)

Republican presidential candidate former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is cheered on by supporters and Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., left, outside City Hall in Nashua, N.H., Sunday, Nov. 20, 2011. Ayotte endorsed Romney earlier. (AP Photo/Winslow Townson)

Republican presidentialcandidate former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney speaks outside City Hall in Nashua, N.H., Sunday, Nov. 20, 2011. (AP Photo/Winslow Townson)

(AP) ? Mitt Romney's Republican presidential campaign steamed forward this weekend, scoring what is one of New Hampshire's most significant political endorsements and fueling a growing sense of inevitability surrounding the former Massachusetts governor's White House bid.

A beaming Romney stood shoulder-to-shoulder with New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte Sunday afternoon, several hours after the popular Republican senator's decision became public.

"There's one person in this field who is prepared to lead the United States of America and that is Mitt Romney," Ayotte told cheering supporters gathered on the city hall steps. "And most importantly, there is one person who I know will ensure that Barack Obama is a one-term president and that is Mitt Romney."

The freshman senator is the latest high-profile addition to an organization that already included Granite State Republican heavyweights like former Sen. Judd Gregg and former Gov. John H. Sununu. But even in a world where the impact of endorsements is often exaggerated, Ayotte's public support is a significant step forward for Romney in New Hampshire. It's led prominent Republicans to suggest that Romney ? who already enjoys tremendous advantages in the first-in-the-nation primary state ? has become so strong here that the real contest on Jan. 10 will be for second place.

"It's certainly going to push him even further ahead. I think this is a very big deal," said Jennifer Horn, a leading Granite State conservative who isn't affiliated with any campaign. "I think it would take something fairly cataclysmic for someone else to come in first in New Hampshire at this point."

Romney hasn't begun to run television advertising yet. Instead, he's been steadily raising money and adding campaign muscle as his Republican opponents struggle to overcome weaknesses. Romney is expected to join the television ad war soon, however.

His campaign had a video crew following the former governor this weekend to gather footage for his first advertisement. He wouldn't share any details when asked about timing.

"As we get closer we will go up on the air. This is a calculation of how much money we have to spend and when is the right time to go up," Romney told reporters following a Saturday night campaign stop in Peterborough. "But I wouldn't expect to be waiting weeks and weeks. It's got to come relatively soon, and it'll happen in the early primary states."

Republican operatives here note that Ayotte is perhaps the most popular politician in the state, having won a resounding victory just one year ago. She brings a network of roughly 3,000 volunteers and 7,000 donors, according to Steve Duprey, a New Hampshire member of the Republican National Committee.

"I don't think you can say Governor Romney has it wrapped up because that last month will be intense and Iowa will have some impact," Duprey said. "But this gives him tremendous campaign muscle."

Like New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's endorsement earlier in the fall, Ayotte's support also offers a bridge to more conservative voters, who have been reluctant to endorse a candidate with a mixed history on some social issues. Romney has struggled to win over that voting bloc in New Hampshire and elsewhere, although some have begun to reluctantly embrace his candidacy in light of repeated stumbles by his rivals.

"Kelly is not an ivory tower establishment-type elected official," Horn said. "She brings a tremendous amount of credibility among grassroots conservative votes."

And with Romney looking on, Ayotte, along with her husband, promised to play an active role in Romney's campaign.

"Joe and I will be doing everything we can to make sure Mitt Romney is the next president of the United States," she said. "We cannot take four more years of this president."

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2011-11-20-US-Romney/id-796e6ce96ebb4af890e153b3630d9502

zodiac killer battlefield 3 review battlefield 3 review real housewives of new jersey coraline coraline wedding crashers

House says no to mandating balanced federal budget (AP)

WASHINGTON ? Rejecting the idea Congress can't control its spending impulses, the House turned back a Republican proposal Friday to amend the Constitution to dam the rising flood of federal red ink. Democrats ? and a few GOP lawmakers ? said damage from the balanced-budget mandate would outweigh any benefits.

The first House vote in 16 years on making federal deficits unconstitutional came as the separate bipartisan "supercommittee" appeared to be sputtering in its attempt to find at least $1.2 trillion in deficit reductions to head off major automatic cuts. The lead Republican on that panel said members were "painfully, painfully aware" of its Wednesday deadline for action and would work through the weekend.

The House voted 261-165 in favor of the measure to require annual balanced budgets, but that was 23 short of the two-thirds majority needed to advance a constitutional amendment.

Democrats overwhelmingly opposed the proposal, arguing that such a requirement would force Congress to make devastating cuts to social programs.

Most Republicans favored the measure, but there were prominent exceptions.

Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the party's point man on budgetary matters, agreed with GOP colleagues that "spending is the problem." But he added that "this version of the balanced budget amendment makes it more likely taxes will be raised, government will grow and economic freedom will be diminished."

Likewise, Rules Committee Chairman David Dreier, R-Calif., said lawmakers should be able to find common ground without changing the Constitution, and he expressed concern that lawsuits filed if Congress failed to balance the budget could result in courts making decisions on cutting spending or raising taxes.

In all, 235 Republicans and 25 Democrats voted for the amendment, four Republicans and 161 Democrats opposed it. The other two Republicans voting no were Justin Amash of Michigan and Louie Gohmert of Texas.

Later in the day, the top Republican on the deficit-reduction supercommittee indicated no deal was near but efforts would continue through the last weekend before Wednesday's deadline.

"We are painfully, painfully aware of the deadline that is staring us in the face," said Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas. "When we have something more to report, we will report."

With the national debt now topping $15 trillion and the deficit for the just-ended fiscal year passing $1 trillion, supporters of the constitutional amendment declared it the only way to stop out-of-control spending. The government now must borrow 36 cents for every dollar it spends.

"It is our last line of defense against Congress' unending desire to overspend and overtax," Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said as the House debated the measure.

But Democratic leaders worked aggressively to defeat it, saying that such a requirement could force Congress to cut billions from social programs during times of economic downturn and that disputes over what to cut could result in Congress ceding its power of the purse to the courts.

Even had it passed, the measure would have faced an uphill fight in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

The House passed a similar measure in 1995, with the help of 72 Democrats. That year, the measure fell one vote short of passing the Senate.

Constitutional amendments must get two-thirds majorities in both houses and be ratified by three-fourths of the states to take effect. The last constitutional amendment ratified, in 1992, concerned lawmaker pay increases.

The second-ranking Democrat, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, voted for the amendment in 1995 but said the situation has vastly changed since then. "Republicans have been fiscally reckless," he asserted, saying the George W. Bush administration would not cut spending elsewhere to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, major tax cuts and a Medicare prescription drug benefit.

"A constitutional amendment is not a path to a balanced budget," said Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas. "It is only an excuse for members of this body failing to cast votes to achieve one."

The measure on the floor Friday, sponsored by Rep. Robert Goodlatte, R-Va., mirrored the 1995 resolution in stating that federal spending could not exceed revenues in any one year. It would have required a three-fifths majority to raise the debt ceiling or waive the balanced budget requirement in any year. But Congress would be able to let the budget go into deficit with a simple majority if there was a serious military conflict.

The Republicans' hope was that the Goodlatte version would attract more Democratic supporters, and the "Blue Dogs," a group of fiscally conservative Democrats, said they were on board. But there are now only 25 Blue Dogs, half the number of several years ago when there were more moderate Democrats, mainly from rural areas, in the House.

Rep. Peter DeFazio, an Oregon Democrat who is not a Blue Dog member, said he was supporting the amendment because "there's an infinite capacity in this Congress to kick the can down the road. ... We are going to have to force people to make tough decisions."

But other Democrats pointed to a letter from some 275 labor and other mostly liberal groups saying that forcing spending cuts or higher taxes to balance the budget when the economy was slow "would risk tipping a faltering economy into recession or worsening an ongoing downturn, costing large numbers of jobs."

Democrats also cited a report by the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimating that, if there is not an increase in revenues, the amendment could force Congress to cut all programs by an average of 17.3 percent by 2018.

The amendment would not have gone into effect until 2017, or two years after it was ratified, and supporters said that would give Congress time to avoid dramatic spending cuts.

Forty-nine states have some sort of balanced budget requirement, although opponents note that states do not have national security and defense costs. States also can still borrow for their capital-spending budgets for long-term infrastructure projects.

The federal government has balanced its budget only six times in the past half-century, four times during Bill Clinton's presidency.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/politics/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111118/ap_on_go_co/us_balanced_budget_amendment

latin grammys latin grammys ogopogo walmart black friday walmart black friday raiders chargers

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Vanessa Minnillo Takes Nick Lachey's Surname (omg!)

Vanessa Minnillo Takes Nick Lachey's Surname

Vanessa Minnillo made things official with Nick Lachey when they tied the knot in July -- and now she's got the Twitter handle to match!

"So. . .I'm making it official, and I LOVE my 'new name!'" the 31-year-old tweeted Friday. "@VanessaLachey has a nice ring to it."

PHOTOS: Vanessa's bikini bod

The newlywed -- who describes herself as a "host by day, wifey by night, wanna-be mommy all the time" in her Twitter profile -- recently purchased a home in in Encino, Calif. with her husband.

Located in the heart of San Fernando Valley, the Spanish-style estate is 8,000 square feet and features a whopping eight bathrooms and 18 rooms. It also includes vaulted beam ceilings, fireplaces, several balconies and a pool.

VIDEO: Why Nick and Vanessa wrote their own vows

With that much space, it's no wonder why the couple is eager to start a family. Lachey, 38, recently told E! News he's been "doing everything I can" to get his wife pregnant.

PHOTOS: Nick and Vanessa's most romantic moments

"Trust me, it would make me very happy," The Sing-Off host said. "Family is very important. It's very important to us, and I'm sure that will be around the corner."

Get more Us! Follow us on Twitter, Friend us on Facebook, Subscribe to Us Weekly

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/entertainment/*http%3A//us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/external/omg_rss/rss_omg_en/news_vanessa_minnillo_takes_nick_lacheys_surname005530274/43650967/*http%3A//omg.yahoo.com/news/vanessa-minnillo-takes-nick-lacheys-surname-005530274.html

lsu vs alabama cain gingrich debate andy rooney dies andy rooney dies bank transfer day daylight savings 2011 day light savings

McDonald's drops egg supplier over cruelty charges (AP)

MINNEAPOLIS ? McDonald's Corp. said Friday it has dropped a Minnesota-based egg supplier after an animal rights group released an undercover video of operations at the egg producer's farms in three states.

The video by Mercy for Animals shows what the group calls animal cruelty at five Sparboe Farms facilities in Iowa, Minnesota and Colorado. Its images include a worker swinging a bird around by its feet, hens packed into cramped cages, male chicks being tossed into plastic bags to suffocate and workers cutting off the tips of chick's beaks.

"The behavior on tape is disturbing and completely unacceptable. McDonald's wants to assure our customers that we demand humane treatment of animals by our suppliers," Bob Langert, McDonald's vice president for sustainability, said in a statement.

The move also followed a warning letter to Sparboe Farms dated Wednesday from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that said inspectors found "serious violations" at five Sparboe facilities of federal regulations meant to prevent salmonella. The warning said eggs from those facilities "have been prepared, packed, or held under insanitary conditions whereby they may have become contaminated with filth, or whereby they may have been rendered injurious to health."

Officials with Sparboe Companies LLC didn't return phone calls, but the company issued a statement calling the video "shocking" and saying an internal investigation identified four employees "who were complicit in this disturbing activity" and were fired this month.

"I was deeply saddened to see the story because this isn't who Sparboe Farms is," owner and president Beth Sparboe Schnell said in a statement posted on a company website. "Acts depicted in the footage are totally unacceptable and completely at odds with our values as egg farmers. In fact, they are in direct violation of our animal care code of conduct, which all of our employees read, sign and follow each day."

Sparboe, which is headquartered in Litchfield, also said on the website that it has made management changes, taken corrective actions sought by the FDA, and begun retraining all barn workers in proper animal care procedures.

Sparboe describes itself as the fifth-largest shell egg producer and marketer in the United States, operating seven processing plants supported by 33 egg-laying and pullet production sites in Iowa, Minnesota and Colorado. The company says it serves retail, wholesale and foodservice customers in 26 states.

McDonald's said the "most alarming actions on video" didn't happen at Sparboe's facility in Vincent, Iowa, which supplied its restaurants, but they violated the standards the company sets for its suppliers. McDonald's also insisted the food it serves is safe.

McDonald's said it got Sparboe eggs via Cargill Inc., which said it was suspending Sparboe as a supplier.

"We will not tolerate mistreatment of animals anywhere in our supply chain," Chris Roberts, president of Cargill Kitchen Solutions, said in a statement. He also said the issues the FDA raised "warrant additional review by Cargill."

Tim Loesch, a spokesman for Wayzata-based Cargill, declined to say how many eggs Sparboe supplied it or how much the company was paid.

Mercy for Animals isn't satisfied with McDonald's decision to stop accepting eggs from Sparboe, said Matt Rice, the group's director of operations.

"These are company-wide, policy-level abuses," Rice said. "There's a culture of cruelty and neglect at McDonald and its suppliers."

McDonald's said it is participating in a three-year study that compares traditional versus cage-free hen housing systems, but Rice said the company continues to get most of its eggs from hens in battery cages that hold a lot of birds in cramped conditions.

"McDonald's is simply sidestepping the issue now. It's time McDonald's requires all of its suppliers to un-cage hens and finally give these animals the basic freedom to spread their wings, to walk and engage in other natural behaviors," he said, noting that McDonald's has already switched to cage-free eggs in Europe.

Mercy for Animals conducted its investigation from May 23 to Aug. 1, Rice said. The group got its people hired at the farms and sent them in wired with hidden cameras, he said. They "documented daily abuses that would shock and horrify most Americans yet are largely considered standard and acceptable to the egg industry," he added.

The video was first aired Friday on ABC's Good Morning America.

___

Online:

Mercy for Animals video site: http://www.mcdonaldscruelty.com

Sparboe Farms response site: http://www.sparboeupdate.com

FDA letter: http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/ucm280413.htm

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/pets/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111118/ap_on_re_us/us_mcdonald_s_egg_supplier

joe walsh zsa zsa gabor heavy d dead heavy d dead alaska weather alaska weather election results